<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rolled vs Cut Thread Bolts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts</link>
	<description>Portland Bolt's Frequently Asked Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-25270</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-25270</guid>
		<description>@akhil Unfortunately, this question is beyond our expertise as we only manufacture bolts with Imperial dimensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@akhil Unfortunately, this question is beyond our expertise as we only manufacture bolts with Imperial dimensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akhil</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-25128</link>
		<dc:creator>akhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 05:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-25128</guid>
		<description>please let me know the basic diameter used for M16, in thread rolling machinem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please let me know the basic diameter used for M16, in thread rolling machinem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-24519</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 13:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-24519</guid>
		<description>My company bought US$200,000 worth of 16mm to 24mm rolled anchor bolts from a supplier in China.
Our engineer claims that the narrower shank (in the case of 20mm goes down to 18.3mm) will not comply with ASTM standards. Is he correct? as I understand that the narrower diameter will have no adverse effect mechanical properties. Note we use our anchor bolts for Pre Engineered Buildings.
Your expert advise will be appreciated. Rgds Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company bought US$200,000 worth of 16mm to 24mm rolled anchor bolts from a supplier in China.<br />
Our engineer claims that the narrower shank (in the case of 20mm goes down to 18.3mm) will not comply with ASTM standards. Is he correct? as I understand that the narrower diameter will have no adverse effect mechanical properties. Note we use our anchor bolts for Pre Engineered Buildings.<br />
Your expert advise will be appreciated. Rgds Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-9624</link>
		<dc:creator>James Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-9624</guid>
		<description>Great Info! Thank you, I use alot of B7 Studs in the water utility industry and this just enlightened me. Any info in the future is much appreciated. Thanks, Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Info! Thank you, I use alot of B7 Studs in the water utility industry and this just enlightened me. Any info in the future is much appreciated. Thanks, Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Waltner</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Waltner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-3002</guid>
		<description>@Freddy Keener - Cutting the threaded portion of the bolt won&#039;t have any effect on the strength of the bolt. The only factor to worry about in a situation like that is that you leave the amount of thread needed to achieve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/recommended-nut-engagement&quot;&gt;minimum thread engagement&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Freddy Keener &#8211; Cutting the threaded portion of the bolt won&#8217;t have any effect on the strength of the bolt. The only factor to worry about in a situation like that is that you leave the amount of thread needed to achieve <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/recommended-nut-engagement">minimum thread engagement</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy Keener</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Keener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>Does a rolled thread fastener become weaker than its equivalent cut thread fastener when cut to a shorter length?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does a rolled thread fastener become weaker than its equivalent cut thread fastener when cut to a shorter length?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Rollston</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Rollston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>why don&#039;t you roll thread anything over 150KSI??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why don&#8217;t you roll thread anything over 150KSI??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Is there a visible difference between rolled and cut threads? I&#039;ve heard that it may be possible to tell based on the curvature of the thread root, but I can&#039;t find a source anywhere that says so either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a visible difference between rolled and cut threads? I&#8217;ve heard that it may be possible to tell based on the curvature of the thread root, but I can&#8217;t find a source anywhere that says so either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>ASTM allows full body A325 bolts to be roll threaded. However, reduced body roll thread, which is the process that Portland Bolt uses and is the topic of this article is not allowed. ASTM states that A325 and A490 structural bolts must meet the dimensional tolerances of ANSI 18.2.6 that would not allow the use of reduced body pitch diameter material. For A449 fasteners it references ANSI 18.2.1 for the dimensional tolerances. This specification allows a reduced body diameter to be used if the manufacturer and purchaser agree. Since the reduced body pitch diameter material is between the major and minor thread dimensions, it is usually allowed for most applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASTM allows full body A325 bolts to be roll threaded. However, reduced body roll thread, which is the process that Portland Bolt uses and is the topic of this article is not allowed. ASTM states that A325 and A490 structural bolts must meet the dimensional tolerances of ANSI 18.2.6 that would not allow the use of reduced body pitch diameter material. For A449 fasteners it references ANSI 18.2.1 for the dimensional tolerances. This specification allows a reduced body diameter to be used if the manufacturer and purchaser agree. Since the reduced body pitch diameter material is between the major and minor thread dimensions, it is usually allowed for most applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re stating that A325 bolts should not be roll threaded. What is you opinion on roll threading non-head A449 bolts and A449 fully threaded studs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re stating that A325 bolts should not be roll threaded. What is you opinion on roll threading non-head A449 bolts and A449 fully threaded studs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

