<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rolled vs Cut Thread Bolts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts</link>
	<description>Portland Bolt's Frequently Asked Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Waltner</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Waltner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-3002</guid>
		<description>@Freddy Keener - Cutting the threaded portion of the bolt won&#039;t have any effect on the strength of the bolt. The only factor to worry about in a situation like that is that you leave the amount of thread needed to achieve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/recommended-nut-engagement&quot;&gt;minimum thread engagement&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Freddy Keener &#8211; Cutting the threaded portion of the bolt won&#8217;t have any effect on the strength of the bolt. The only factor to worry about in a situation like that is that you leave the amount of thread needed to achieve <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/recommended-nut-engagement">minimum thread engagement</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy Keener</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Keener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>Does a rolled thread fastener become weaker than its equivalent cut thread fastener when cut to a shorter length?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does a rolled thread fastener become weaker than its equivalent cut thread fastener when cut to a shorter length?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Rollston</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Rollston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>why don&#039;t you roll thread anything over 150KSI??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why don&#8217;t you roll thread anything over 150KSI??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Is there a visible difference between rolled and cut threads? I&#039;ve heard that it may be possible to tell based on the curvature of the thread root, but I can&#039;t find a source anywhere that says so either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a visible difference between rolled and cut threads? I&#8217;ve heard that it may be possible to tell based on the curvature of the thread root, but I can&#8217;t find a source anywhere that says so either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>ASTM allows full body A325 bolts to be roll threaded. However, reduced body roll thread, which is the process that Portland Bolt uses and is the topic of this article is not allowed. ASTM states that A325 and A490 structural bolts must meet the dimensional tolerances of ANSI 18.2.6 that would not allow the use of reduced body pitch diameter material. For A449 fasteners it references ANSI 18.2.1 for the dimensional tolerances. This specification allows a reduced body diameter to be used if the manufacturer and purchaser agree. Since the reduced body pitch diameter material is between the major and minor thread dimensions, it is usually allowed for most applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASTM allows full body A325 bolts to be roll threaded. However, reduced body roll thread, which is the process that Portland Bolt uses and is the topic of this article is not allowed. ASTM states that A325 and A490 structural bolts must meet the dimensional tolerances of ANSI 18.2.6 that would not allow the use of reduced body pitch diameter material. For A449 fasteners it references ANSI 18.2.1 for the dimensional tolerances. This specification allows a reduced body diameter to be used if the manufacturer and purchaser agree. Since the reduced body pitch diameter material is between the major and minor thread dimensions, it is usually allowed for most applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re stating that A325 bolts should not be roll threaded. What is you opinion on roll threading non-head A449 bolts and A449 fully threaded studs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re stating that A325 bolts should not be roll threaded. What is you opinion on roll threading non-head A449 bolts and A449 fully threaded studs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>Portland Bolt has two methods of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portlandbolt.com/manufacturingcapabilities/threading.html&quot;&gt;threading bolts&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;strong&gt;Roll threading&lt;/strong&gt; is mainly limited by diameter (up to 1&quot;) and material grade restrictions. This is a very fast way of threading large quantities and produces a very cost effective bolt. &lt;strong&gt;Cut threading&lt;/strong&gt; is primarily used for bolts over 1&quot; up through 6&quot; in diameter, high strength fasteners, and smaller manufacturing runs. Since we have two threading options, the most effective method is selected for each order, saving customers time and money. We specialize in large non-standard anchor bolts for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portlandbolt.com/industriesserved/lightpoletraffic.html&quot;&gt;light pole and traffic signal industry&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Portland Bolt has two methods of <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/manufacturingcapabilities/threading.html">threading bolts</a>. <strong>Roll threading</strong> is mainly limited by diameter (up to 1&#8243;) and material grade restrictions. This is a very fast way of threading large quantities and produces a very cost effective bolt. <strong>Cut threading</strong> is primarily used for bolts over 1&#8243; up through 6&#8243; in diameter, high strength fasteners, and smaller manufacturing runs. Since we have two threading options, the most effective method is selected for each order, saving customers time and money. We specialize in large non-standard anchor bolts for the <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/industriesserved/lightpoletraffic.html">light pole and traffic signal industry</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLIAM  WADE</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLIAM  WADE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>WHY IS PORTLAND BOLT LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM 1&quot; DIAMETER&quot; I WOULD THINK IN THE CONSTRUCTION TRADE, BOLTS CAN GET UP TO 2 1/4&quot; IN DIAMETER..i.e TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHY IS PORTLAND BOLT LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM 1&#8243; DIAMETER&#8221; I WOULD THINK IN THE CONSTRUCTION TRADE, BOLTS CAN GET UP TO 2 1/4&#8243; IN DIAMETER..i.e TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Oakley</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding your expertise, Doug. You are correct no one should ever make changes to specifications without the engineer&#039;s approval. An elaboration on note 5 under &quot;Disadvantages of roll threading&quot; briefly talks about this concern. We don&#039;t have any engineers on staff and always recommend that they be consulted before any changes are made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding your expertise, Doug. You are correct no one should ever make changes to specifications without the engineer&#8217;s approval. An elaboration on note 5 under &#8220;Disadvantages of roll threading&#8221; briefly talks about this concern. We don&#8217;t have any engineers on staff and always recommend that they be consulted before any changes are made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rolled-vs-cut-threads-bolts/comment-page-1#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/wordpress/rolled-vs-cut-threads#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>The shank diameter of bolts connecting timber components can be critical.  Bending strength in longer bolts may control the capacity of the connector.  A .912” diameter bolt through a 10 ¾” timber member would have ~18% less load capacity than a 1.000” diameter bolt.  Rolled thread bolts should not be used in timber systems unless done so with the blessing of the designer/specifier.
Bolt design equations can be found ANSI/AF&amp;PA NDS-2005, Part 11.3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shank diameter of bolts connecting timber components can be critical.  Bending strength in longer bolts may control the capacity of the connector.  A .912” diameter bolt through a 10 ¾” timber member would have ~18% less load capacity than a 1.000” diameter bolt.  Rolled thread bolts should not be used in timber systems unless done so with the blessing of the designer/specifier.<br />
Bolt design equations can be found ANSI/AF&amp;PA NDS-2005, Part 11.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
