<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask the Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs</link>
	<description>Portland Bolt's Frequently Asked Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Galvanized Bolts and Chased Threads</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/galvanized-bolts-and-chased-threads</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/galvanized-bolts-and-chased-threads#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Galvanizing Bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galvanizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tapped oversize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, externally threaded fastener should not be "chased". Chasing threads is a term used to describe re-cutting threads after galvanizing to remove excess zinc gained during the galvanizing process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box">Are threads chased after hot-dip galvanizing for proper nut fit?</p>
<p>No, externally threaded fasteners should not be “chased”. Chasing threads is a term used to describe re-cutting threads after galvanizing to remove excess zinc gained during the <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/manufacturingcapabilities/galvanizing.html">galvanizing process</a>. Reworking the threads can possibly remove the zinc coating and eliminate the corrosion protection of the threaded portion of the fastener. Chasing, if not performed with extreme precision, can also remove additional steel from the threaded portion of the fastener resulting in threads that are undersized and out of tolerance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM-F2329.html">ASTM F2329</a> is a relatively new specification that covers galvanized fasteners and supersedes <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM-A153.html">A153</a>. This specification (5.4.1) clearly prohibits the alterations of threads after galvanizing stating, &#8220;Fasteners that have been hot-dip galvanized shall not be further altered (such as subjected to a cutting, rolling, finishing-tool operation) by the galvanizer unless specifically authorized in writing&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Portland Bolt’s custom galvanizing system is specifically designed for threaded fasteners and uses centrifugal force to clean the threads. After parts are removed from the galvanizing tank they are spun immediately following using a high-speed spinner. This process creates high quality galvanized threads and trouble-free nut fit. In addition, <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/galvanized-nuts-tapped-oversize">galvanized nuts are tapped oversize</a> to accommodate the extra 2 – 6 mils of thickness that hot-dip galvanizing adds. The tolerance for tapping nuts is covered under <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A563.html">A563</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/galvanized-bolts-and-chased-threads/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Large Diameter SAE Bolts</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/large-diameter-sae-bolts</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/large-diameter-sae-bolts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large diameter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, SAE only covers bolts up to and including 1&#189;" diameter. SAE J429 (1999), the specification that covers Grade 2, 5, and 8 fasteners, states, "This SAE standard covers the mechanical and material requirements for inch-series steel bolts, screws, studs, SEMS, and U-bolts used for automotive and related industries in sizes to 1½ in. inclusive."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box">Are SAE Grade 2, 5, and 8 bolts available in diameters over 1½&#8221;?</p>
<p><img style="margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px; float: left;" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/technical/fastener_identification_markings/gr8.gif" alt="SAE Grade 8 Head Marking"/></p>
<p>No, SAE only covers bolts up to and including 1&frac12;&#8221; diameter. SAE J429 (1999), the specification that includes Grade 2, 5, and 8 fasteners, states, &#8220;This SAE standard covers the mechanical and material requirements for inch-series steel bolts, screws, studs, SEMS, and U-bolts used for automotive and related industries in sizes to 1½ in. inclusive.&#8221;</p>
<p>When diameters larger than 1½&#8221; are required, ASTM specifications should be considered since many cover fasteners larger than 1½&#8221; diameter. Generally speaking, for construction applications ASTM is the most appropriate standard. SAE is more commonly specified for automotive, equipment, or machinery applications.</p>
<table cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>SAE J429 Grade</th>
<th>Comparable ASTM Specification</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Grade 2</td>
<td><a target="_blank" href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A307.html">A307 Grade A</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Grade 5</td>
<td><a target="_blank" href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A449.html">A449</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Grade 8</td>
<td><a target="_blank" href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A354.html">A354 Grade BD</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="align-left" colspan="2">This chart compares SAE and ASTM specifications that are similar but not identical in diameters through 1&frac12;&#8221;.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/large-diameter-sae-bolts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headed Anchor Bolts vs Rod with a Nut</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/headed-anchor-bolts-vs-rod-nut</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/headed-anchor-bolts-vs-rod-nut#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchor Bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolt testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headed bolts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot forging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a rod with a nut is substituted for a bolt with a forged head, two issues come into play. In-house mechanical testing performed by Portland Bolt on headed bolts versus rods with a nut, both from the identical lots of steel, the rod with a nut developed up to 12% less strength than the comparable headed bolt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a rod with a nut is substituted for a bolt with a forged head, two issues come into play. In-house mechanical testing performed by Portland Bolt on headed bolts versus rods with a nut, both from the identical lots of steel, the rod with a nut developed up to 12% less strength than the comparable headed bolt. The reason for this reduction in strength on the rod with nut is that the stress area at the junction of the rod and nut (which is substituting for the forged bolt head) is significantly reduced. Because the minor diameter (valley) of the threads is significantly less than the full size diameter of the shank on a headed bolt, the rod with nut often breaks at a much lower strength than a headed bolt. More importantly, even if the rod with nut does develop enough strength to meet the specification, it will often break at the junction of the nut which is acting as the head of the bolt when wedge tested per ASTM F606. For this reason, technically a rod with nut in lieu of a headed bolt will frequently fail mechanical testing because the head (nut in this case) comes off before the bolt breaks in the body or threaded section of the fastener which constitutes an automatic failure.</p>
<p>We often see fastener distributors and manufacturers without forging capabilities talking customers into switching from a headed bolt to a rod with a nut since they are unable to provide the forged product that was engineered into the structure.  Substituting a nut for a forged head is not limited to anchor bolts, but that is where we see it occur most frequently. Making the decision to switch from a bolt with a forged head to a rod with a nut should always be approved by an engineer to prevent any liability in making such a substitution should a failure of the fasteners occur.</p>
<h2>Wedge Testing per ASTM F606</h2>
<div class="col2 center">
<img src="/image/misc/quiz/headed-test.gif" alt="Strength test for a headed anchor bolt"/>
</div>
<div class="col2 center">
<img src="/image/misc/quiz/all-thread-test.gif" alt="Strength test for all thread with a welded nut"/>
</div>
<div class="col2 center">
<img src="/image/misc/quiz/broken-headed.gif" alt="Headed anchor bolt breaks in the threads"/></p>
<p>Headed Anchor Bolts</p>
</div>
<div class="col2 center">
<img src="/image/misc/quiz/broken-all-thread.gif" alt="All thread breaks under welded nut"/></p>
<p>Rod with a Nut</p>
</div>
<div class="colend">
</div>
<p>Note:  Wedge testing as shown above is required to obtain mechanical properties for most ASTM high strength fasteners. A greater difference was found for high strength fasteners than mild steel fasteners during Portland Bolt in-house testing of headed bolts versus rods with a nut. The reduced cross sectional area at the junction of the nut as compared to a bolt with a forged head caused the fasteners with a nut acting as a bolt head to break at lower strengths than the bolts with forged heads. Additionally, the high strength rods with a nut acting as a head broke just below the nut which would automatically constitute a failure since the wedge test requires the bolt to break either in the body of the bolt or in the threaded portion, not at the junction of the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/headed-anchor-bolts-vs-rod-nut/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weight Gained from Galvanizing</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/weight-gained-from-galvanizing</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/weight-gained-from-galvanizing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Galvanizing Bolts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A description of the estimated weight gain due to hot-dip galvanizing fastener.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box"><strong>Question:</strong> How much weight is gained from hot-dip galvanizing bolts?</p>
<p><img alt="Galvanized Bolt" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/galv-bolts.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(170, 170, 170); float: right; width:160px;"/><br />
<strong>Answer:</strong> According to the <a class="external" target="_blank" href="http://www.galvanizeit.org/aga/inspection-course/help-and-reference/faq/#23">American Galvanizers Association (AGA)</a> the weight of an item on average will increase about 3.5% from the zinc added during the galvanizing process. However, the <abbr title="American Galvanizers Association">AGA</abbr> goes on to say, &#8220;&#8230;that figure can vary greatly based on numerous factors. The fabrication’s shape, size, and steel chemistry all play a major role, and other factors like the black weight, the different types of steel that get welded together, and the galvanizing bath chemistry can also have an effect.&#8221;</p>
<p>When considering galvanized fasteners this percentage is often lower. For example, the actual increase in the weight of a galvanized 1&#8243; x 10&#8243; A307 hex bolt compared to a plain hex bolt is approximately 0.26%. The zinc thickness requirement for <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/manufacturingcapabilities/galvanizing.html">hot-dip galvanizing threaded fasteners</a> is covered by <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM-F2329.html">ASTM F2329</a>. This specification states the average minimum coating thickness at 1.7 mils (.0017 in.). Overall the weight increase of fasteners due to zinc from galvanizing is fairly minimal. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/weight-gained-from-galvanizing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coating Options for High Strength Bolts</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/corrosion-resistant-options-for-high-strength-bolts</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/corrosion-resistant-options-for-high-strength-bolts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Galvanizing Bolts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A summary of corrosion resistant coating options for high strength bolts. Bolts with an ultimate tensile strength higher than 150 ksi can not be hot-dip galvanized. Here are some alternatives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to hydrogen embrittlement concerns ASTM recommends against <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/galvanizing-high-strength-bolts">hot-dip galvanizing </a> , mechanical deposition, or electroplating with zinc or other metallic coatings on high strength bolts ultimate tensile strengths that exceed 150 ksi. So what are the alternatives to provide corrosion resistance for A490 structural bolts? </p>
<p><strong>Protective Coatings</strong><br />
ASTM recommends that if a protective coating is required for A490 bolts a Zinc/Aluminum Corrosion Protective Coating should be used in accordance with F 1136 Grade 3. This recommendation is based on findings from research conducted by the Industrial Fastener Institute (IFI 144). No other metallic coating is allowed unless authorized by ASTM&#8217;s fastener Committee F16.  One trade name of this coating is Dacromet. </p>
<p><strong>Weathering Steel</strong><br />
Another option is to specify <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A490.html">ASTM A490 Type 3</a>. This fastener is made from weathering steel which is inherently corrosion resistant. However, these fasteners are not as readily available in the marketplace as A490 Type 1.</p>
<p>Consulting a structural engineer involved on the project is always the best solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/corrosion-resistant-options-for-high-strength-bolts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASTM and SAE Some Differences</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/astm-and-sae-bolt-differences</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/astm-and-sae-bolt-differences#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two specifying bodies when it comes to fasteners. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) covers primarily bolts and fasteners for construction applications. SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) covers fasteners for automotive, machinery, and OEM applications.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box">Whats are the main difference between ASTM 307 GR.B, ASTM A449, and SAE Grade 5 bolts?</p>
<p>There are two specifying bodies when it comes to fasteners. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) covers primarily bolts and fasteners for construction applications. SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) covers fasteners for automotive, machinery, and OEM applications.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A307.html">ASTM A307 grade B</a> is made from a low carbon steel and is a relatively low strength heavy hex bolt or stud specifically intended for cast iron pipe flange connections. <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A449.html">ASTM A449</a> is a medium carbon steel that is heat treated to develop higher strength characteristics than A307 grade B. Whereas A307 grade B is limited by its configuration (heavy hex head bolt or stud) and its application (cast iron flange connections), A449 can be used for general applications and is unlimited in its configuration. In other words, an A449 bolt can be any type of headed bolt, any shape of bent bolt, or straight rods that are fully threaded, have threads on both ends, or have tread on one end only. Grade 5 bolts are covered under SAE guidelines and by nature are a more precision fastener than ASTM bolts. They are virtually identical to ASTM A449 in chemistry and strength, but max out at 1-1/2&#8243; diameter while A449 bolts extend to 3&#8243; diameter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/astm-and-sae-bolt-differences/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bolt Thread Length</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/bolt-thread-lengths</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/bolt-thread-lengths#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolt thread lengths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on the type of bolt you are using the thread length can vary greatly. There is not an inclusive thread length standard that covers all fasteners. Depending on the applications, manufacturer, and a number of other factors the amount thread may change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="box"><strong>Question:</strong> Is there a standard thread length for bolts?</div>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Depending on the type of bolt you are using the thread length can vary greatly. There is not an inclusive thread length standard that covers all fasteners. Depending on the applications, manufacturer, and a number of other factors the amount thread may change. It is important to clearly communicate at time of purchase your desired thread lengths on headed bolts in addition to bent anchor bolts and threaded rods. Below is a brief outline of common fasteners and the thread lengths generally found in the marketplace.</p>
<p><strong>Hex / Heavy Hex Bolts</strong><br />
ASME B18.2.1 which covers hex, heavy hex, and square head bolts, states bolts 6&#8243; in length and under have a thread length that is twice the diameter plus 1/4&#8243;. Bolts that are longer than 6&#8243; have a thread length of twice the diameter plus 1/2&#8243;. For example, a 1/2 x 6 hex bolt will have 1-1/4&#8243; of thread, whereas a 1/2 x 6-1/2 hex bolt will have 1-1/2&#8243; thread. In our experience, most &#8220;off the shelf bolts&#8221; that are longer than 12&#8243; have 6&#8243; of thread.</p>
<p><strong>Structural Bolts</strong><br />
Structural bolts like ASTM A325 and A490 specify shorter thread lengths since these bolts are used for steel-to-steel connections and the amount of grip length is critical thread lengths are much shorter. A325 heavy hex bolts with the S1 supplement are to be fully threaded. Those with the S1.2 supplement must be marked, “A325 T”.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" style="margin: auto;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Nominal Bolt Size, in.</th>
<th>1/2</th>
<th>5/8</th>
<th>3/4</th>
<th>7/8</th>
<th>1</th>
<th>1-1/8</th>
<th>1-1/4</th>
<th>1-3/8</th>
<th>1-1/2</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Thread Length, in.</th>
<td>1.00</td>
<td>1.25</td>
<td>1.38</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>1.75</td>
<td>2.00</td>
<td>2.00</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>2.25</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="margin:14px">
<p><strong>Carriage Bolts</strong><br />
ASME B18.5 it states that the thread lengths for carriage bolts 6&#8243; in length and under have a thread length that is twice the diameter plus a 1/4&#8243; and bolts longer than 6&#8243; have a thread length of twice the diameter plus 1/2&#8243;. However, the import carriage bolts we stock are fully threaded for bolts 6” long and under and 6” of thread for bolts longer than 6”. </p>
<p><strong>Lag Bolts</strong><br />
The minimum thread length shall be equal to one-half the nominal screw length plus 1/2&#8243; or 6”, whichever is less.</p>
<p><strong>Anchor Bolts</strong><br />
For any type of bent bolt or straight rod there are no thread standards. The thread length of anchor bolts change significantly depending on the application, projection from the top of concrete, and a number of other factors. Most structural drawings will outline the exact dimensions of the anchor bolts, including thread length. It is important to remember that anchor rods often specify different thread lengths on each end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/bolt-thread-lengths/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tie Rod Assembly Configurations</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tie-rod-assembly-configurations</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tie-rod-assembly-configurations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astm tie rods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clevis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnbuckle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tie rods, clevises, and turnbuckles are an important part of many architectural designs. Canopy supports, structural steel bracing, and walkway hangers are a few of the applications that use these assemblies. The unique configuration allows for field adjustments in both length and tension.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;">
<img style="margin=auto;" src="../image/faq/Steel-Tie-Rod-Clevis-Turnbuckle.jpg" alt="Construction Tie Rod Assembly" />
</div>
<p class="box">How are tie rods, turnbuckles, and clevises configured?</p>
<p><a href="../products/rods/tie_rod.html">Tie rods</a>, <a href="../products/others/clevises.html">clevises</a>, and <a href="../products/others/turnbuckles.html">turnbuckles </a>are an important part of many architectural designs. Canopy supports, structural steel bracing, and walkway hangers are a few of the applications that use these assemblies. The unique configuration allows for field adjustments in both length and tension.</p>
<p><strong>Adjustment</strong><br />
Adjustments are possible by threading opposing ends of the rod right hand (RH) and left hand (LH). Another alternative is to provide two clevises threaded RH and use a turnbuckle in the middle that has RH and LH threads. The assembly length and tension is adjusted by rotating the turnbuckle. Both options allow the assembly to be installed and easily adjusted in place.</p>
<p><img style="float:left;" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/clevis-grip.jpg" alt="Clevis Grip" /><strong>Grip</strong><br />
The grip on a clevis refers the distance between the legs. This is the area that will be placed over the plate and held by a pin. Generally, the grip size is calculated by the material thickness plus ¼”. Keep in mind the minimum grip is ¾” for #2 through #5 clevises and 1” for #6 and #7.<br />
<br/><br/><br />
<img style="float:right;" src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/clevis-pin.jpg" alt="Clevis Pin" /><strong>Pin</strong><br />
Clevis pins are available headed or smooth and are generally secured with a cotter pin connection. In some applications an ASTM A325 structural bolt can also be used to connect the clevis to the structure. Refer to the <a href="../products/others/clevises.html">Diameter of Pin in Inches</a> chart on the clevis page for the appropriate pin dimensions. This chart is designed so that the pin will surpass the matching rod strength.</p>
<p><strong>Galvanizing</strong><br />
Hot-dip galvanized clevises and turnbuckles are available. It is crucial for correct fit that the clevises and turnbuckles are tapped oversize to account for the additional thickness from zinc on the tie rods. To ensure the proper fit Portland Bolt assembles all parts prior to shipping.</p>
<p><strong>Common Layouts</strong><br />
<em>Tie Rod with Two Clevises and a Turnbuckle</em><br />
<img src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/Tie_Rod1.jpg" alt="Steel Tie Rod with Clevises and Turnbuckle" /></p>
<p><em>Tie Rod with Two Clevises Only</em><br />
<img src="http://www.portlandbolt.com/image/faq/Tie_Rod2.jpg" alt="Steel Tie Rod with Clevises" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tie-rod-assembly-configurations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of ASTM A325 and A449</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/comparison-of-astm-a325-and-a449</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/comparison-of-astm-a325-and-a449#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lindsay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASTM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These bolts are identical with regard to strength and chemistry. There are very minor differences in the hardness requirements, but the proof load, tensile, and yield strength requirements are the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="box">I have two items that use 1&#8243; bolts, one is ASTM A325 and the other is ASTM A449, I would like to just use one.  Which is the one that meets or exceeds the other?</p>
<p>These bolts are identical with regard to strength and chemistry. There are very minor differences in the hardness requirements, but the proof load, tensile, and yield strength requirements are the same. From a manufacturing standpoint, we make these bolts using the same raw material and the same heat treating and production methods. Our <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/fastener_identification_markings.html">strength by grade chart</a> gives a detailed comparison.</p>
<p>The difference between these two specifications (<a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A325.html">A325 </a>and <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/astm/ASTM_A449.html">A449</a>) is the diameter range, configuration, and application. A325 bolts are heavy hex head bolts ONLY, and are designed for structural steel connections. They range in diameter from ½” – 1-1/2” inclusive. Due to their application, an A325 <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/products/bolts/structural_bolts.html">structural bolt</a> has a shorter thread length than a typical<a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/products/bolts/heavy_hex_bolts.html"> heavy hex bolt</a>. If you need a bolt with longer threads, ASTM A449 should be used.</p>
<p>ASTM A449 bolts range in diameter from ¼” – 3” inclusive and are far more flexible in their configuration. In other words, A449 bolts can be a headed bolt, a straight rod with threads, or a bend bolt such as a right angle bend foundation bolt.</p>
<p>With regard to availability, A325 bolts are mass produced and far more common in the marketplace than A449 bolts. Therefore, A325 bolts would be immediately available and considerably less expensive than A449 bolts, unless the bolts you are dealing with are exceedingly long in length. Since the thread length on A325 bolts is very short you should make sure they will be adequate for your application. ASTM suggests using A449 in lieu of A325 when a nonstandard thread length is needed. Here is an excerpt from the A325 specification:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>This specification is applicable to heavy hex structural bolts only. For bolts of other configurations and thread lengths with similar mechanical properties, see Specification A 449.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>For example, a 1” diameter A325 bolt that exists in the marketplace will have 1-3/4” of thread. There is a supplemental requirement in the A325 specification for fully threaded A325-T bolts that are 4 X diameter in length or shorter. There are often 1” diameter fully threaded A325’s that are readily available but they are no longer than 4” in length.</p>
<p>Portland Bolt’s position regarding ASTM specifications are that they are simply guidelines. They provide a buyer with a reasonable expectation as to the product they will receive if they order it to an ASTM specification. However, if the buyer and seller agree to change any portions of the specification, that is acceptable as long as the change is clear and agreed upon by both parties. Therefore, we frequently manufacture A325 bolts with longer thread lengths than “standard”. Since 1” diameter A325 bolts wouldn’t exist “on the shelf” with that nonstandard thread length anyhow (2-3/8”), it would make more sense to spec the bolt to A449 since it would be the proper spec to use and the bolts would need to be manufactured special regardless of which specification you choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/comparison-of-astm-a325-and-a449/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concerns Calculating Torque</title>
		<link>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/concerns-calculating-torque</link>
		<comments>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/concerns-calculating-torque#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Oakley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Torque is a difficult value to calculate accurately, especially for construction fasteners and should be used cautiously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torque is a difficult value to calculate accurately, especially for construction fasteners and should be <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/tension-vs-torque-explained-sort-of">used cautiously</a>. The primary challenge is accounting for environmental factors, coatings, and a number of other variables including surface texture, material hardness, and thread series. In most situations, it is challenging to give reliable allowable torque values for bolted assemblies. For the most accurate data we recommend <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rotational-capacity-testing">field testing</a> the intended assemblies using a calibrated torque wrench and a Skidmore-Wilhelm load indicating device to equate actual torque to the desired tension. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.portlandbolt.com/technicalinformation/bolt-torque-chart.html">theoretical torque values</a> listed on our site are intended as reference point. This chart only covers products with a published friction coefficient. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/concerns-calculating-torque/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
